Skip to main content

In re Davis

Citations

  • 84 Ohio St. 3d 520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that seven-day time provision of R.C. 2151.35 (B) (3) is directory and not mandatory
  • noting that the consequences of dismissal and refiling after all hearings are held is not in the best interests of the children
  • time requirement for juvenile court to make disposition order is directory and not jurisdictional
  • a petition for a writ of procedendo “‘is appropriate when a court has unnecessarily delayed proceeding to judgment’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.