In Re Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a debtor’s failure to make mortgage payments after confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan is sufficient grounds for lifting the stay without any further inquiry into adequate protection.”
• “the debtors’ failure to make post-confirmation payments will also constitute cause for lifting the stay”
• five or six- month default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Taylor
  E.D. New York· 1993-03-09· cited 20×
• FSFG Service Corp. v. Ki Joong Kim (In Re Ki Joong Kim)
  C.D. California· 1987-04-13· cited 18×
• In Re Smith
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-09-08· cited 13×
• In Re Uvaydov
  E.D. New York· 2006-10-17· cited 11×
• In re Morrow
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-06-27· cited 11×
• McCullough v. Horne (In re McCullough)
  W.D. North Carolina· 2013-07-10· cited 11×
• In Re Reice
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-07-01· cited 10×
• LAMARCHE v. Miles
  E.D. New York· 2009-03-31· cited 8×
• In Re Lee
  S.D. Mississippi· 1992-10-30· cited 8×
• In Re Brown
  S.D. Ohio· 1987-09-04· cited 5×
• In Re Barnes
  E.D. Michigan· 1991-03-14· cited 3×
• In re Aguirre
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-04-18· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ellis v. Parr (In Re Ellis )
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-12-23· cited 66×
• In Re Clark
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 21×
• Matter of Quinlan
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1981-07-13· cited 17×
• Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Moore (In Re Shahid)
  S.D. Ohio· 1982-10-26· cited 15×