Supreme Court of Delaware· 5/27/2009
In Re Davis
Citations
- 974 A.2d 170
- 2009 WL 1472214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding lawyer violated Rule 8.4(a) by causing staff members to notarize documents when the lawyer did not sign the documents in the notary’s presence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Chief Justice, Holland, Berger, Jacobs and Ridgely, Justices
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re KatzSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-09-24· cited 5×
- In Re GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-03-15· cited 2×
- In Re O'BrienSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-07-20· cited 1×
- In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State: KatzSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-09-24· cited 1×
- In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court, of the State, GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-03-15· cited 1×
- In the Matter of a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware· 2023-11-09
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re BaileySupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-05-02· cited 44×
- In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware FigliolaSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-01-26· cited 40×
- In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-09-06· cited 36×
- In Re BengeSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-06-13· cited 21×
- In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court, of the State of Delaware, DavisSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-05-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.