· 12/1/1998
In Re: David Warren Watson, Debtor. David Warren Watson v. James Proctor Central Bank Suzanne Nebeker
Citations
- 161 F.3d 593
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8759
- 22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2091
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 12168
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 30482
- 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 675
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an individual “was the sole participant in his own pension plan” and therefore was properly “not considered an ‘employee’ for purposes of ERISA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sneed, Hall, Rymer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.