· 6/6/2024
In Re David McKeand v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the REAL ID Act \expressly eliminated district courts' habeas jurisdiction over removal orders\
- emphasizing that courts “are bound by holdings, not unwritten assumptions”
- overruling prior precedent in light of Brand X and an intervening BIA interpretation, and denying a petition for review on the basis of the new statutory interpretation
- collecting decisions explaining that unaddressed issues or assumptions are not binding precedent
- alien who begins but does not complete naturalization process is not a national of the United States even though he was a lawful permanent resident
- “We are bound by hold- ings, not unwritten assumptions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.