In re David J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restrictive placement requiring minimum term of confinement did not render juvenile proceeding so akin to adult system that right to jury trial was required
• restrictive placement requiring minimum term of confinement did not render juvenile proceeding so akin to adult system that right to jury trial was required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re L.M.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-20· cited 52×
• In re James OO.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-12-19· cited 18×
• In re Bernard C.
  NYC Family Court· 1996-01-29· cited 6×
• People v. Putland
  New York County Courts· 1979-12-28· cited 4×
• In Re LM
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-06-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
• People ex rel. Wayburn v. Schupf
  New York Court of Appeals· 1976-05-13· cited 59×
• People v. O'Bryan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1971-01-14· cited 5×
• People v. Randolph
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1972-11-28· cited 5×