Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/25/1998
In Re David H.
Citations
- 967 P.2d 134
- 192 Ariz. 459
- 276 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15
- 1998 Ariz. App. LEXIS 153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a probation officer is a peace officer for purposes of the aggravated assault statute
- “[J]udging the credibility of witnesses and resolving conflicts in testimony are uniquely the province of the trial court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brammer, Espinosa, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- State v. CidCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-03-23· cited 67×
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-132905Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-07-16· cited 30×
- State v. NelsenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-07-23· cited 23×
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-123196Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-28· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.