In Re: Daryl Lee Vote, Debtor. Wayne Drewes, as Bankruptcy Trustee v. Daryl Lee Vote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that applying the “sufficiently rooted” test to the claim at hand would broaden the scope of § 541 beyond claims which exist at the commencement of the case
• distinguishing between an existing, contingent interest with some potential value, and a mere hope
• trustee could not show how estate acquired an interest in prepetition crop losses for which the debtor was compensated under legislation enacted postpetition
• bankrupty court’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo
• BAP’s factual findings are reviewed for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo
• “To find for the trustee on the basis that the payments were ‘sufficiently rooted’ would allow the trustee to assert more rights than [Mr.] Vote had at the commencement of his case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).