In re Danielle G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is appropriate to entertain an interlocutory appeal “to correct recurring problems in the handling of cases by Immigration Judges”
• noting that an IJ has authority to consider additional evidence on remand “if it is material, was not previously available, and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing”
• “[W]e have historically treated a remand as effective for consideration of all matters unless it is specifically limited to a stated purpose.”
• IJ has authority to consider additional evidence on remand “if it is material, was not previously available, and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing.”
• an IJ has authority to consider additional evidence on remand “if it is material, was not previously available, and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing”
• an IJ has authority to consider additional evidence on remand “if it is material, was not previously available, and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).