In re Danielle B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a father’s motion for relief from judgment based on his assertion that he had been falsely assured that he could have visitation with his child after a termination judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re H.C.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2013-11-12· cited 10×
• In re Children of Jessica J.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2020-03-12· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. PT Petro Corp.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-15· cited 13×
• Fleet Bank of Maine v. Hunnewell
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1993-11-19· cited 11×