In re Daniel H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of extreme emotional disturbance or self-defense not relevant for purpose of rebutting finding of probable cause as to the charge of murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Keijam T.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-02-04· cited 41×
• In re Michael B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-12-13· cited 12×
• Curry v. Burns
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-11-16· cited 8×