Skip to main content
· 11/13/2014

In re Dana W. Johnson

Citations

  • 103 A.3d 194
  • 2014 D.C. App. LEXIS 505
  • 2014 WL 5858945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Mr. Johnson refused the Board’s specific requests that he explain the nature of his client relationship or explain what steps he took to obtain the client’s information
  • noting that Mr. Johnson refused the Board‘s specific requests that he explain the nature of his client relationship or explain what steps he took to obtain the client‘s information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glickman, Beckwith, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.