In Re Dale Dunn v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state law imposing different labeling standards for bacon and flour was preempted because it would frustrate the Congressional purpose of providing direct comparisons for consumers
• holding state standard regulating the accuracy of net weight labeling on meat and poultry products that differed from the federal standard was preempted
• noting that courts must “consider the relationship between the state and federal laws as they are interpreted and applied, not merely as they are written.”
• stating that obstacle preemption inquiry requires a consideration of the \relationship between state and federal laws as they are interpreted and applied not merely as they are written\
• stating that obstacle preemption inquiry requires a consideration of the \relationship between state and federal laws as they are interpreted and applied not merely as they are written\
• quoting, Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67, 61 S.Ct. 399, 404, 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).