Skip to main content
· 8/4/1989

In Re Dakota Rail, Inc.

Citations

  • 104 B.R. 138
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1256
  • 1989 WL 87532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Only where the disclosure statement on its face relates to a plan that cannot be confirmed does the court have an obligation not to subject the estate to the expense of soliciting votes and seeking confirmation of the plan; otherwise, confirmation issues are left for later consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nancy C. Dreher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.