· 4/4/1968
In re DaFano
Citations
- 55 C.C.P.A. 1134
- 392 F.2d 280
- 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 192
- 1968 CCPA LEXIS 371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The [Supreme] Court held that the factfinder’s rejection of the employer’s proffered reasons does not compel judgment for the Title YII plaintiff____”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almond, Rich, Smith, Worley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.