In re: D.A.
Citations
- 811 S.E.2d 729
- 258 N.C. App. 247
Syllabus
Conduct inconsistent with constitutionally protected status as parent clear, cogent and convincing evidence standard ceasing reunification efforts, NCGS 7B-906.2 permanent custody foster parents.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that the trial court must establish the four factors in Section 7B-906.2(d) when ceasing reunification efforts under Section 7B-906.2(b)
- vacating and remanding the trial court's order with instructions to \make the necessary statutory findings and conclusions to determine whether to cease reunification efforts\
- vacating order ceasing reunification efforts due to trial court’s failure to include findings embracing the requisite ultimate question of whether reunification efforts clearly would be unsuccessful or would be inconsistent with the juvenile’s health or safety
- vacating order ceasing reunification efforts due to trial court’s failure to include findings embracing the requisite ultimate question of whether reunification efforts clearly would be unsuccessful or would be inconsistent with the juvenile’s health or safety
- “Absent clear findings, based upon clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, demonstrating how [the respondent parent] acted inconsistently with his [or her] constitutionally protected status,” it is error for the trial court to award permanent custody of a minor child to a third party.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tyson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re: M.T-L.Y.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-05-21· cited 10×
- In re: J.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-05-05
- In re: S.R.J.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-04-06
- In re: S.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-04-06
- In re: J.M. & N.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-04-06
- In re: J.C-B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-03-16
- In re L.R.L.B.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2021-04-23
- In re: K.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-06-15
- In re: N.Z.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-20
- In re: B.R.W. & B.G.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-07-20
- In re: J.R. & J.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-09-21
- In re: A.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-11-02
- In re S.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-02-05
- In re D.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-02-19
- In re K.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-02-19
- In re J.M., N.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2023-06-16
- In re: D.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-12-15
- In re: Q.J.P., M.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-10-15
- In re: T.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-12-03
- In re: N.M.W. & A.N.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-05-21
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.