Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/2/2008
In re D. H.
Citations
- 283 Ga. 556
- 663 S.E.2d 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a statute making it unlawful for any person to disrupt or interfere with the operation of any public school contains words of ordinary meaning that give constitutionally sufficient notice as to the statute’s application
- holding that a statute making it unlawful for any person to disrupt or interfere with the operation of any public school contains words of ordinary meaning that give constitutionally sufficient notice as to the statute’s application
- saying only that the appellant contended that a criminal statute was “unconstitutionally vague,” without identifying whether the claim was raised under the United States or Georgia constitution, and citing mostly federal cases
- this Court had jurisdiction where the constitutional question was raised and distinctly ruled upon orally at the hearing
- this Court had jurisdiction where the constitutional question was raised and distinctly ruled upon orally at the hearing
- although OCGA § 20-2-1181 was not unconstitutionally vague, an overbroad challenge was waived because not raised below
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-01-12· cited 83×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-11-17· cited 54×
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-09-14· cited 30×
- ROCKDALE COUNTY. v. U. S. ENTERPRISES, INC.; And Vice VersaSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-11-02· cited 17×
- Raber v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-03-23· cited 7×
- Watson v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-10-29· cited 5×
- LOVE v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-03-07· cited 5×
- In the Interest of B. Q. L. E.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-13· cited 5×
- State v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-18· cited 4×
- McNair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-06-08· cited 2×
- WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELLSupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-10-31· cited 2×
- In Re DHSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-06-02
- In Re BQLECourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-13
- In the Interest of D. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-11-10
- In the Interest Of: J. S., a ChildCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-03-15
- STATE OF GEORGIA v. EDWARD CLAYCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-09-30
- Jessica Pinkerton v. Kathy S. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-05-05
- State v. Bryan Coleman DagueCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-18
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,428×
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 1,379×
- Cameron v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 595×
- Wallin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-07-07· cited 95×
- State v. FieldenSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-04-25· cited 73×
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-10-06· cited 72×
- DeKalb County v. Post Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-01-08· cited 48×
- Richmond Concrete Products Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia· 1956-12-05· cited 35×
- In the Interest of J. R. R.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 9×
- Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-11-20· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.