Skip to main content

In re D. H.

Citations

  • 283 Ga. 556
  • 663 S.E.2d 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statute making it unlawful for any person to disrupt or interfere with the operation of any public school contains words of ordinary meaning that give constitutionally sufficient notice as to the statute’s application
  • holding that a statute making it unlawful for any person to disrupt or interfere with the operation of any public school contains words of ordinary meaning that give constitutionally sufficient notice as to the statute’s application
  • saying only that the appellant contended that a criminal statute was “unconstitutionally vague,” without identifying whether the claim was raised under the United States or Georgia constitution, and citing mostly federal cases
  • this Court had jurisdiction where the constitutional question was raised and distinctly ruled upon orally at the hearing
  • this Court had jurisdiction where the constitutional question was raised and distinctly ruled upon orally at the hearing
  • although OCGA § 20-2-1181 was not unconstitutionally vague, an overbroad challenge was waived because not raised below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.