· 6/6/2001
Federal Case
Citations
- 252 F.3d 1039
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 5693
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4600
- 59 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1097
- 44 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 639
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11750
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that it has been held “on numerous occasions ... that the Patent Act preempts ... state law that grants patent-law protection to a product”
- “[W]e presume that words used more than once in the same statute have the same meaning throughout.”
- “[F]ederal copyright laws ensure predictability and certainty of copyright ownership . . . .” (quoting In re Peregrine Entm’t, Ltd., 116 B.R. 194, 199 (C.D. Cal. 1990)
- “We review for abuse of discretion orders granting relief from an automatic stay.”
- standard of review for orders granting relief from an automatic stay
- using statute’s title as an interpre- tation tool
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.