In re C.W.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 262
Syllabus
Sulek - Trial court errs when it fails to consider restitution to the victim of a juvenile offender's delinquent acts. The victim did not assign as error and lacks standing to argue that her parents are also \victims\ entitled to restitution under Marsy's Law. The victim's claim of restitution and her parents' claim of restitution are not so dependent and interwoven that reversal of the judgment pertaining to her also constitutes a reversal of the judgment as to her parents.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FutrallOhio Supreme Court· 2009-10-29· cited 110×
- In Re AntrobusTenth Circuit· 2008-03-14· cited 66×
- In Re StewartEleventh Circuit· 2008-12-19· cited 34×
- In Re Rendon GalvisSecond Circuit· 2009-04-27· cited 25×
- Wigton v. LavenderOhio Supreme Court· 1984-01-11· cited 22×
- In re Complaint of Pilkington N. Am., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-11-24· cited 21×
- In Re McNultySixth Circuit· 2010-03-01· cited 18×
- Alesi v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-24· cited 16×
- In re A.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-08· cited 10×
- McAdams v. Mercedes-Benz, USA, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-16· cited 5×
- UBS Fin. Servs., Inc. v. LacavaOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-29· cited 4×
- Warino v. Worldwide News Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-30· cited 3×
- In re N.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.