Skip to main content
· 2/12/2010

In Re CVS Caremark Corp. Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation

Citations

  • 684 F. Supp. 2d 1377
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13715
  • 2010 WL 532561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing three broad circumstances in which centralization wage and hour litigation is less compelling: (1) when the duties of the subject employees appear subject to significant local variances or would entail significant localized discovery; (2
  • “the Panel’s primary purpose is not to divine the motives and strategies of the various litigants”
  • “the Panel’s primary purpose is not to divine the motives and strategies of the various litigants”
  • “[I]t is ‘within the 26 very nature of coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in multidistrict litigation 27 for the transferee judge to be called upon to apply the law of more than one state.’”
  • “[I]t is within the very nature of coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in 16 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. USJPML multidistrict litigation for the transferee judge to be called upon to apply the law of more than one state.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David, Hansen, Heyburn II, John, Kathryn, Miller, Robert, Royal, Vratil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.