Skip to main content
· 8/29/1989

In Re Cutters, Inc.

Citations

  • 104 B.R. 886
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1452
  • 1989 WL 100611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f a document purports to contain a single contract but in reality contains separate severable agreements, then the debtor may reject a severable executory agreement.”
  • sev-erable sale contract was so substantially performed to render it nonexecutory
  • the court determined that a single document contained separate agreements regarding sale of assets and future mutual obligations to market certain inventory; the sale portion of the contract was substantially performed and nonexecutory while the marketing agreement was executory and rejectable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George C. Paine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.