In re Culverhouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a court may use the full statutory range only in “an unusual case”
• reasoning that a court may use the full statutory range only in “an unusual case”
• citing, inter alia , Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
• “[Section] 1512 requires showing a reasonable likelihood” of a communication to “a federal officer, not a state or local officer”
• “The statute does not require proof that the defendant knew the federal status of the officer or underlying proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).