Court of Appeals of Texas· 10/12/2006
In re C.S.
Citations
- 208 S.W.3d 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding evidence legally sufficient to support best-interest finding even though patient did not address her religious beliefs
- explaining the uses of Reglan and the potential adverse consequences from its prolonged prescription
- explaining the uses of Reglan and the potential adverse consequences from its prolonged prescription
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holman, Livingston, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Guyton v. MonteauTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-01-13· cited 78×
- Wendy Collini, M.D. v. Martha PustejovskyTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-02-12· cited 63×
- In re B.D.A.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2018-02-08· cited 37×
- in the Interest of C.L., and I.L., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-10-14· cited 31×
- in the Interest of D.M.F., a ChildTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-04-16· cited 16×
- In Re CSCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-02
- In Re CLTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-11-04
- Sonny v. Thottumkal v. Gurnaib SidhuTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-12-09
- K.T. v. M.T.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-08-14
- StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-07-16
- in the Interest of S.W. and S.W., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-10-09
- in the Interest of R.L. and A.L., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-07-31
- in the Interest of M.C. and D.K., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-06-12
- Courtney Guyton v. Cynthia Ann MonteauTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-01-13
- in the Interest of E. K., B. G., and L. G., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-05-14
- in the Interest of A. M. and C. M., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2013-05-09
- in the Interest of R. T., J. L., and E. Y., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2013-02-07
- StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2014-08-13
- in the Interest of T.N.C., C.M.C., and J.P.C., Minor ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2011-11-03
- in the Matter of A.S.K.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-07-18
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court· 2005-06-10· cited 10,088×
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court· 1965-11-03· cited 3,215×
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1986-04-02· cited 2,766×
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court· 1998-07-03· cited 1,981×
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court· 1994-06-08· cited 1,624×
- In the Interest of G. M.Texas Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,156×
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1981-06-30· cited 962×
- Laidlaw Waste Systems (Dallas), Inc. v. City of WilmerTexas Supreme Court· 1995-09-14· cited 752×
- State v. AddingtonTexas Supreme Court· 1979-10-03· cited 658×
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court· 2004-12-31· cited 481×
- Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1986-12-03· cited 362×
- Diamond Shamrock Refining Co., LP v. HallTexas Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 180×
- Barnard v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-04-01· cited 116×
- Regan v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-05-05· cited 73×
- Trimble v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory ServiceTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-04-09· cited 60×
- Betts v. ReedTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-07-06· cited 35×
- In Re F.M.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-12-22· cited 31×
- B.J. Valve & Fitting Co. v. Elliott Valve Repair Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1984-10-31· cited 23×
- R.S.C., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-25· cited 18×
- In the Best Interest of E.T.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2004-04-28· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.