Skip to main content
· 1/6/1948

In re Croskey

Citations

  • 35 C.C.P.A. 864
  • 165 F.2d 797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving district court’s ruling that Title I would be defeated if plaintiff in ballot-tampering case had to wait until ballots were counted and then pursue remedy under Title IV; no specific discussion of § 483

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biatfield, Bland, Connell, Gaekett, Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.