In Re Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The actual (or at least potential) tax consequences of the form make it inequitable to allow the [creditor] to enforce its claims against the debtors. Until the [creditor] corrects or withdraws the 1099-C it mistakenly filed . . . , it cannot enforce its claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DEBT BUYERS'ASS'N. v. Snow
  District of Columbia· 2006-01-30· cited 18×
• In re Reed
  E.D. Tennessee· 2013-05-14· cited 13×
• In re Sarno
  D. Massachusetts· 2011-12-20· cited 8×
• Bank of Am., N.A. v. Rolf
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2020-11-12· cited 4×
• Rose M. Geister v. Discover Bank
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-12-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• McDonald v. Mabee
  Supreme Court· 1917-03-06· cited 322×
• Haley v. Hershberger
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1971-06-12· cited 51×
• Neville v. Hennigh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-05-11· cited 12×
• Banister v. Carnes
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1983-12-29· cited 8×
• Riverview State Bank v. Dreyer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1961-05-13· cited 4×