Skip to main content
· 6/28/2001

In Re Critical Path, Inc. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 156 F. Supp. 2d 1102
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11481
  • 2001 WL 883190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Institutional investors may need to exceed this limitation and do not represent the type of professional plaintiff [the PSLRA] seeks to restrict.”
  • “This approach assumes that the ‘fraud premium,’ which is the amount by which the stock is inflated because of the alleged misrepresentations, stayed constant throughout the class period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.