In Re Criimi Mae, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding exchange of collateral satisfied the \indubitable equivalent\ prong
• rejecting argument that \no plan that contemplates the sale of collateral of a dissenting class of secured claims can be found `fair and equitable' unless it complies with section 1129(b)(2)(A)(ii)\
• rejecting argument that “no plan that contemplates the sale of collateral of a dissenting class of secured claims can be found ‘fair and equitable’ unless it complies with section 1129(b)(2)(A)(ii)”
• statement that the parties intended the repo to be a sale was not vitiated or made equivocal by the savings provision set forth in the second part of the paragraph should the repo be deemed a loan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).