In Re Creighton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an assumption agreement is a species of reaffirmation and, accordingly, requires compliance not only with § 365(p)(2) but also with § 524(c)
• “It would thus appear that an assumption agreement negotiated and entered into under § 365(p)(2), when not otherwise excepted from discharge by § 523(a), is an agreement to which § 524(c) pertains; it is a species of reaffirmation agreement.”
• emphasizing the consumer protection purpose of the BAPCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).