Skip to main content
· 4/22/1999

In Re CR Davidson Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 232 B.R. 549
  • 1999 WL 280708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in bankruptcy context, that an “order refusing a motion to dismiss is interlocutory”
  • holding appeal timely when Notice of Appeal was filed after entry of memorandum opinion containing no order, decree or judgment, and before bankruptcy court’s entry of judgment
  • notice of appeal from nonfinal memorandum decision deemed filed on date of subsequent final order because the defect was neither misleading nor prejudicial
  • ‘We stress ... that the mandates of Rule 8003 must not henceforth be ignored.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lifland, C.J., Krechevsky, and Brozman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.