D. Massachusetts· 7/17/1992
In Re Cowles
Citations
- 143 B.R. 5
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1126
- 1992 WL 174497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing a hypothetical avoidance action for purposes of determining whether a Chapter 13 debtor’s liquidation analysis should include trust property
- where debtor held pervasive power with regard to trust, the assets of the trust must be made available for satisfaction of the creditors’ claims
- where debtor/settlor held pervasive power with regard to trust, the assets of the trust must be made available for satisfaction of the creditors’ claims
- \The Court can allow the creditors to reach the assets of the trust without requiring revocation of the trust.\
- “Commentators have noted that the importance of this case and others arriving at the same conclusion should not be underestimated, as prior to these recent decisions, a power of revocation was not regarded as an interest in property reachable by creditors.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James A. Goodman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Markham, etc v. FayFirst Circuit· 1996-02-07· cited 70×
- Butler v. Candlewood Road Partners, LLC (In re Raymond)D. Massachusetts· 2015-04-17· cited 19×
- Marrama v. Degiacomo (Marrama)First Circuit· 2004-11-04· cited 14×
- In Re PoffenbargerS.D. Alabama· 2002-03-25· cited 12×
- Lyons v. Federal Savings Bank (In Re Lyons)D. Massachusetts· 1996-03-25· cited 12×
- In Re RyanD. Massachusetts· 1997-06-16· cited 9×
- Braunstein v. Beatrice (In Re Beatrice)D. Massachusetts· 2002-04-19· cited 8×
- Matter of HenadyN.D. Indiana· 1994-03-29· cited 6×
- Markham v. FayD. Massachusetts· 1995-03-22· cited 5×
- In re PeirceD. Massachusetts· 2012-10-01· cited 5×
- Nielsen v. Field (In re Nielsen)D. Hawaii· 2015-03-11· cited 5×
- Lassman v. Paulding (In Re Paulding)D. Massachusetts· 2007-06-20· cited 4×
- In re VanBuskirkD. Massachusetts· 2014-05-20· cited 4×
- Murphy v. Felice (In re Felice)D. Massachusetts· 2013-06-12· cited 3×
- In re VolkD. Massachusetts· 2017-08-10
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 3,653×
- National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1944-02-02· cited 97×
- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. ReiserMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-05-23· cited 62×
- Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-05-05· cited 41×
- In Re PerryD. Massachusetts· 1991-09-18· cited 30×
- Matter of GiffordN.D. Indiana· 1988-11-07· cited 26×
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. StockdaleMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-04-13· cited 17×
- Wolfe v. WolfeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-12-17· cited 16×
- Karen A. George v. Kitchens by Rice Bros., Inc.First Circuit· 1981-12-01· cited 14×
- Balanoff v. Glazier (In Re Steffan)N.D. New York· 1989-02-24· cited 6×
- Guthrie v. CantyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1944-03-29· cited 6×
Other cases named In Re Cowles
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In re CowlesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1946-06-27· cited 5×
- In re CowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-10-22· cited 3×
- In re CowlesD. Minnesota· 1867-07-01· cited 1×
- In re CowlesD.C. Circuit· 1924-04-07· cited 1×
- In re CowlesHawaii Supreme Court· 2018-02-07
- In re CowlesNew York Supreme Court· 1901-04-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.