Skip to main content
· 5/22/1995

In Re County of Orange

Citations

  • 183 B.R. 594
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 721
  • 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 321
  • 1995 WL 319205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “courts have ... applied to chapter 9 cases the judicial reasoning that developed in chapter 11 cases” regarding good faith
  • arguing that Section 81(7) of the 1898 Act defined political subdivisions, Section 81(6) defined public agencies and Sections 81(l)-(5) defined instrumentalities
  • observing that the “general policy of chapter 9 is to give a debtor a breathing spell from debt collection efforts so it can work out a repayment plan with creditors”
  • finding no bad faith where a municipal debtor filed for chapter 9 “to protect its assets and allow it the opportunity to work out an adjustment of its debts in an orderly way”
  • “The OCIP had no time to enter into negotiations with its participants before acting to protect its portfolio assets.”
  • “The impracticality requirement may be satisfied based on the sheer number of creditors involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John E. Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.