In re County Bridge, Nescopeck Township

Citations

• 120 Pa. 288
• 14 A. 419
• 1888 Pa. LEXIS 483

Syllabus

<p>1. That the foreman of a grand jury reporting in favor of a county bridge, under the Luzerne county act of April 16, 1870, P. L. 1199, was one of the petitioners for the bridge, is a sufficient reason for setting aside the court’s approval of the report, without limit as to time, if before the erection of the bridge.</p> <p>2. Dubitatur: Whether orders of approval and confirmation of roads and bridges made in the routine work of the Quarter Sessions, without notice to the parties to be affected thereby, ought to be regarded as of the same degree of solemnity as judgments regularly entered after notice or on warrants of attorney: per Williams, J.</p>