In Re Countrywide Financial Corp. Mortg. Marketing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting conflicting case law regarding whether California recognizes unjust enrichment as a claim and declining to conclude the claim was not legally cognizable
• noting conflicting case law regarding whether California recognizes unjust enrichment as a claim and declining to conclude the claim was not legally cognizable
• noting conflicting case law regarding whether California recognizes unjust enrichment as a claim and declining to conclude the claim was not legally cognizable
• noting the Ninth 14 Circuit had not definitively ruled on the issue, but other federal courts of appeals had found no 15 private right of action
• discussing out-of-circuit authority and the “formal or practically separable” definition of distinctiveness from McCullough
• court determining whether an unjust enrichment claim, an unfair competition claim brought under California law, and a false or misleading statements claim brought under California law were preempted by the NBA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).