In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, M.D.L. No. 310. Appeal of Phillip L. Fleischacker, Deponent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a prosecutor cannot use answers by a witness to ques- tions posed by a civil litigant if those questions were derived from a protected statement
• compelling answers to questions “concerning specific subjects that actually were touched upon by questions appearing in the transcript of the immunized testimony”
• compelling answers to questions \concerning specific subjects that actually were touched upon by questions appearing in the transcript of the immunized testimony\
• collecting cases for the proposition that a “witness is entitled to claim the Fifth 5 Amendment privilege if it might reveal perjury in a prior proceeding” (emphasis added)
• where transcript of witnesses’s immunized testimony constituted the source of questions posed to the same witness in a civil proceeding, responsive answers to such questions are unavailable for subsequent prosecutorial use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).