Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
E.D. Pennsylvania· 10/28/2003

In Re Corel Corp. Inc. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 293 F. Supp. 2d 484
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21024
  • 2003 WL 22764523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding attorneys’ fees of 35% of settlement plus interest and reimbursement of expenses
  • “A decision that notice is appropriate is required before any inquiry is made into the merits of the set- tlement itself.”
  • “Courts generally recognize that a proposed class action settlement is presumptively valid where, as in this case, the parties engaged in arm’s length negotiations after meaningful discovery.”
  • “Courts generally recognize that a proposed class action settlement is presumptively valid where, as in this case, the parties engaged in arm’s length negotiations after meaningful discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anita B. Brody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Corel Corp. Inc. Securities Litigation

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.