Skip to main content
E.D. Virginia· 7/28/2008

In Re Cordova

Citations

  • 394 B.R. 389
  • 2008 WL 2953445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting Virginia’s exemption statute and stating “[t]he evident purpose of the exemption is to ... protect the basic tools and utensils in order to aid the debtor in continuing in his means of livelihood”
  • “the General Assembly has effectively precluded the creation of a tenancy by the entireties in motor vehicles”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephen S. Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Cordova

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.