In Re Corbett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding counsel was required to represent debtors, in spite of “association” agreement with other attorney only to appear for debtors at the first meeting of creditors, because no formal order of withdrawal was obtained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Culbertson v. Clemens
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-20· cited 25×
• In Re Sunderland
  M.D. Florida· 1993-07-30· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Wood and Henderson
  Supreme Court· 1908-05-18· cited 120×
• In The Matter Of Futuronics Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1981-08-07· cited 106×
• In Re Rheuban
  C.D. California· 1990-11-16· cited 35×
• Flint Area School Employee Credit Union v. Nogami (In Re Nogami)
  M.D. Florida· 1990-05-31· cited 10×
• Signet Bank/Virginia v. Hale (In Re Hale)
  M.D. Florida· 1992-04-22· cited 4×