In Re Coralynn F. Nelson, Debtor-Appellant v. La Crosse County District Attorney (State of Wisconsin) and Tim Gruenke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting this argument on the grounds that there is nothing in Article I indicating that the States consented to being sued in the bankruptcy court
• rejecting this argument on the grounds that there is nothing in Article I indicating that the States consented to being sued in the bankruptcy court
• \It is well settled that issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are deemed waived.\
• it is “well settled that issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are deemed waived”
• “It is well settled that issues raised for the first time in a reply brief are deemed waived.”
• grant or denial of sovereign immunity, in that case invoked by a state, is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).