In Re Copley Press, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a qualified First Amendment right of public access attaches to, among other documents, a plea colloquy transcript
• reiterating that even when the public has a qualified right of access to a document, that right can be overcome
• recognizing a “qualified First Amendment right of access” to the “cooperation addendum” to a “plea agreement” in that case
• finding district court clearly erred in 11 unsealing documents where there was a substantial probability doing so would endanger 12 lives
• describing motion to unseal and order by the district court ruling on the motion
• “The public has no right to access the declarations and documentation appended to the government’s March 16 motion to seal....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).