District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 11/21/2007
In re Cooper
Citations
- 936 A.2d 832
- 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 672
- 2007 WL 4116067
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Courts should not decide more than the occasion demands.” (quoting District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. P’ship, 630 A.2d 174, 182 (D.C. 1993))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Ruiz, Schwelb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pietrangelo v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-04-11· cited 46×
- In re MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-01-05
- In re JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-07-27
- In re DanielsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-08-10
- In re JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-08-31
- In re DomanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-05-16
- In re LumajDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-01-16
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-07-29· cited 93×
- In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-11-09· cited 14×
- In Re LillyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-18· cited 13×
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-12-30· cited 6×
- In Re KitchingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-30· cited 5×
- In Re ScanlonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-01-06· cited 5×
- In Re BurnettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-07-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.