In Re Control Data Corporation Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no “manifest injustice” in denying an amendment where “the class should have been fully 14 aware of the viable claims it could pursue”
• finding “no evidence of manifest injustice to justify relief from the order,” where “the class should have been fully aware of the viable claims it could pursue”
• finding “no evidence 13 of manifest injustice to justify relief from the order,” where “[a]fter four years of discovery, the class should have been fully aware of the viable claims it could pursue”
• “To the extent that the defendant’s misrepresentations artificially altered the price of the stock and defrauded the market, causation is presumed.”
• “whether a misrepresentation would have the effect of defrauding the market and inflating the stock price is a jury question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).