In re Continental Transportation & Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no prosecutorial misconduct where the defendants complained of “a few unrelated statements and events from an eight-defendant trial that lasted one month and involved the testimony of dozens of witnesses and the presentation of more than 200 exhibits”
• holding the issue of sentencing credit “is not ripe for review until the Bureau of Prisons has ruled on a defendant’s request for credit”
• “Bruto'n does not bar the use of a redacted codefendant’s confession even if the codefendant’s confession becomes incriminating when linked with other evidence adduced at trial.” (quotation-omitted)
• “As the jury is presumed capable of sorting out the evidence and considering the case against each defendant separately, the appellants have failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion [from denial of their motions for severance].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).