Skip to main content
· 11/4/1988

In re Conticommodity Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 123 F.R.D. 574
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 935
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12582
  • 1988 WL 142148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that documents prepared in the ordinary course of business are not work product even if litigation is imminent or ongoing
  • noting that the work product doctrine is broader than the attorney-client privilege
  • “The determination of whether materials are prepared in anticipation of litigation ..., while central to the work product doctrine, eludes precision.”
  • party resisting discovery obligated to compile privilege log listing each separate document claimed to be beyond discovery
  • U.S. v. White, 950 F.2d 426, 430 (7th Cir. 1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.