· 4/28/1982
In Re Contempt Proceedings, Jefferson Bruer Boyden
Citations
- 675 F.2d 643
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no indication that [the witness] was called for the sole purpose of being bludgeoned with contempt penalties.”
- “There is no indication that [the witness] was called for the sole purpose of being bludgeoned with contempt penalties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gee, Garza, Tate
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.