Skip to main content
· 3/21/1995

In Re Contempt of Robertson

Citations

  • 531 N.W.2d 763
  • 209 Mich. App. 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that contempt is a “wilful act, omission or statement that tends to . . . impede the functioning of a court”
  • stating that contempt is a “wilful act, omission or statement that tends to . . . impede the functioning of a court”
  • “It is well established that when a contempt is committed outside the presence of the court, the law requires that the accused be advised of the charges against him, afforded a hearing regarding those charges, and given a reasonable opportunity to meet the charges by defense of explanation.”
  • “It is well established that when a contempt is committed outside the presence of the court, the law requires that the accused be advised of the charges against him, afforded a hearing regarding those charges, and given a reasonable opportunity to meet the charges by defense of explanation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald, P.J., and Michael J. Kelly and E.R. Post

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.