In Re Contempt of Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that adverse rulings, even if erroneous, are not in and of themselves a valid basis for demonstrating judicial bias
• noting that a trial court’s frustration with the appellant did not rise to the level of actual bias or prejudice
• stating that “a court speaking through its written orders and judgments”
• “When a contempt is committed in the immediate view and presence of a court and immediate corrective action is necessary, the court may summarily punish it.”
• “[A] court speaks through its written orders and judgments, not through its oral pronouncements.”
• “[A] court speaks through its written orders and judgments, not through its oral pronouncements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).