Skip to main content
· 1/5/1983

In Re Consolidated Rate Appeals of Green Mountain Power Corp.

Citations

  • 455 A.2d 823
  • 142 Vt. 373
  • 1983 Vt. LEXIS 602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Commission's choices with respect to setting rates \are subject to great deference in this Court so long as it can be shown they are directed at proper regulatory objectives\
  • “burden of supporting change in rates or rate structure [lies] squarely on the proponent utility”
  • This Court will not undertake to prescribe the many approaches to rate regulation that the Board must use.
  • Board’s decisions subject to great deference by this Court so long as they are directed at proper regulatory objectives

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Larrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.