In Re Conservatorship of Sylvia Carlyle Brainard

Syllabus

After two sets of relatives filed competing petitions for the appointment of a conservator over the respondent, the parties entered into an agreed order and settlement agreement that provided that the respondent was not in need of conservator, but that the parties had certain obligations that were subject to review by the court and guardian ad litem going forward. Months later, appellants filed a petition to set aside the agreed order on the basis that appellees had not complied with its terms; appellees responded with a motion to dismiss appellants' petition on the basis that they had not alleged proper grounds to set aside the parties' agreement. After a hearing on the motion to dismiss, the trial court entered an order stating that \[a]ll outstanding orders should be set aside and all petitions and the case dismissed\ without explanation. Because we cannot review the trial court's sua sponte dismissal without an adequate explanation, we vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings.