In re Consensual Overhear

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “[u]nder the rule of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, when an act lists things to which it refers, the court may infer that any omissions were intended as exclusions”
• stating that, “[u]nder the rule of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, when an act lists things to which it refers, the court may infer that any omissions were intended as exclusions”
• presumption did not apply to court proceedings authorizing a wiretap

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).