In Re Conley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 11 U.S.C. §§ 547 & 548 powers limited to the trustee
• “[individual creditors generally have no remedy to institute such an action ... except through the trustee or debtor-in-possession” (quotation omitted; alteration in Conley )
• “These avoidance powers are for the benefit of the estate[.]”
• “These avoidance powers are for the benefit of the estate.... ”
• “It may also be appropriate, where a trustee or debtor in possession wrongfully refuses to bring an action under [11 U.S.C.] section 547 or 548, for the court to give permission for a creditor to bring such an action on behalf of the estate.”
• construing 11 U.S.C. §§ 547, 548 & 1123(b)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ABF Capital Management v. Kidder Peabody & Co. (In Re Granite Partners, L.P.)
  S.D. New York· 1997-07-16· cited 45×
• McCarthy v. Navistar Financial Corp. (In Re Vogel Van & Storage, Inc.)
  N.D. New York· 1997-06-23· cited 27×
• Hillen v. City of Many Trees (In re CVAH, Inc.)
  D. Idaho· 2017-05-02· cited 16×
• In Re Zwirn
  S.D. Florida· 2007-02-21· cited 10×
• In Re Valley Park, Inc.
  D. Montana· 1998-03-17· cited 8×
• In RE McGUIRK
  N.D. Georgia· 2009-08-31· cited 7×
• Hyman v. Harrold (In Re Harrold)
  M.D. Florida· 2003-08-01· cited 6×
• In re C.D. Jones & Co.
  N.D. Florida· 2012-11-05· cited 6×
• In Re Arnold
  E.D. Texas· 1995-01-10· cited 5×